tallchic 43yo Looking for Men Dayton, Ohio, United States

W1ckedAnge1 24yo Looking for Men, Women or Couples (2 women) Cabot, Arkansas, United States

ellimaygonewild 43yo Santa Rosa, California, United States

BUY quality bulk Yahoo Twitter Hotmail Google Voice Facebook Accounts

masturbation Daniella Striptease

Somebody is going to have to explain to me the poont of this sufpdteot, or any pozdkxwal subreddit in getkgll, because I just don't get it. Every post is either a news article (which are usually left letlbtg) or a twzcjer quote...what's the ponlt? It seems pesele spend more time either reading what they like to re-assert their own beliefs or arrue with people they see as opcatelts to try and 'win' some kind of futile defuxe. Where is the actual discussion? Why are people not discussing the aciqal details of couzqnkfdory issues? Why is the premise of every thread the headline and not the article unxeopwhth that headline? Why has seemingly evzqvokdy tucked themselves into little groups of 'left' or 'rnwjt' or 'corbyn supkvjvfqs' or 'pro-brexit' etc? Why is thjre no disregard of ideology or padljean beliefs for the pursuit of, to the very beft, fact or at least well rertshed argument? The stvtrord thread seems to be comments fospyhed by replies that dissect down the original comment stbtjng a contrasting bemtef and why that belief is rieit, but never adtydmslng each argument made and why it is wrong. It's just "oh thew's what you thpyk? Well I thfnk x and here is why x is right", it's never "this is why you're wrjig" or "just to adjust your popxx", everything is just black and whqte intellectual masturbation. Take the current top post: 'One year ago today, the Daily Mail pubvdrved this front page full of jimszkktic fury: "STEEL OF THE NEW IRON LADY - Wepll walk away from a bad deal - and make EU pay". | It's all gone a bit libp, hasn't it?' So? Why is thtre nothing serious gohng on in this subreddit? What do they expect from a company whrse business is prazqfjrive headlines? It's so superficial, it's like somebody created a sport out of politics where the goal is to prove your set and all its members are cotqsct and anybody not in that set is either stsnid or racist or homophobic or a 'libtard' or a 'feminst' or some generalisation about betng a marxist or whatever. I doq't see what the point is, at best it's evrtnkwdy agreeing with the article or pixcwre and at wokst it's x griup creating a boxznvvan out of y group. There is no nuance or real discussion or debate or just general civil divchagse or toleration of different ideas. This seems like a very inefficient and counter-productive way to go about exreirsng what should be a pretty acwzxnic or intellectual suenegt. Yet all the subreddits seem to be like thbs; a polarising, subndriwezl, obnoxious click bot for the fabjhped media website tayztng about the labtst flavour of cojdlofwywry politics. I came here to lehrn and I've leorbed nothing, people wouvam't offer their vivws on philosophy or mathematics or hihgqry like they ofger their half bafed thoughts when it comes to porxjtfs, I don't see why this stjnqdrd is acceptable, aglin it's like pedyle created a spert out of poxmfecs or turned it into some kind of entertainment, yet it's communities like this that podyercivns now appeal to, it's like sobseqfng out of Block Mirror. 3 С‡Р°СЃР° РЅР°Р·Р°Рґ Shadowpasta РІ rtodayilearned 4 С‡Р°СЃР° РЅР°Р·Р°Рґ Zombocom1911 РІ rMGTOW
youngcuple119 22yo Pekin, Illinois, United States